Condado de Essex / West Orange / Accidentes de Auto

West Orange Car Accident Lawyer Condado de Essex, New Jersey

If you were hurt in Hackensack, James Vasquez fights to get you every dollar you are owed. He has represented Bergen County's injured since 2004, and he knows this county seat's I-80, Route 4 and Route 17 corridors, its historic Hackensack River bridges, and the streets around Main Street and Hackensack University Medical Center.

Free Case Review

case results

No Fee Unless We Win

Available 24/7

Response Within 1 Hour

Car Accidents in Hackensack

The no pay, no play rule, stated plainly

$500 Million

Recovered for New Jersey Families

22 Yrs

Serving New Jersey

This is the least comfortable page on this site and it is the one people most need an accurate answer to, because the usual advice is either falsely encouraging or gives up too early.

New Jersey provides that a person who, at the time of an accident resulting in injuries to them, was required but failed to maintain the mandated medical expense benefits coverage has no cause of action for recovery of economic or noneconomic loss sustained as a result of an accident while operating an uninsured automobile. That is the whole of it. Not a reduction, not a threshold to clear. No cause of action. The Supreme Court upheld the provision as constitutional, and courts have described the outcome as harsh while confirming that it is what the statute requires. It reaches further than people assume. Economic loss has been held to include property damage, so the bar is not limited to injury compensation. And it is not avoided by pointing to an out of state policy, because a vehicle garaged in New Jersey needs coverage meeting New Jersey requirements. Related provisions separately bar a cause of action where a person is convicted of or pleads guilty to driving while intoxicated in connection with an accident, or acted with specific intent to cause injury. There are genuine limits, and they matter. Reading them accurately is the difference between having no claim and assuming you have none. James Vasquez has handled New Jersey injury claims since 2004.

See past case results

Injuries we handle

West Orange car accident claims we take on

Including the situations where the bar does not apply.

yes Accident Facts

Four limits worth checking before giving up

Each turns on the words of the provision rather than on an appeal to fairness.

You were not in a car at all

Someone struck while walking or cycling did not sustain their loss while operating an uninsured automobile, whatever the state of any vehicle they own.

Why it matters: owning an uninsured car does not automatically bar every claim you might ever bring.

You were covered elsewhere

People assume they were uninsured when a household policy, an employer's policy or a vehicle owner's policy in fact covered their use.

Why it matters: the question is whether the required coverage existed, not whether you personally paid for it.

You were not operating

The bar addresses loss sustained as a result of an accident while operating an uninsured automobile. A passenger in that vehicle was not operating it.

Why it matters: passengers in an uninsured car are in a different position from the driver, and they are frequently told otherwise.

Coverage actually existed

Whether a policy was in force on the day is frequently contested. Cancellation notice requirements, grace periods and renewal disputes all arise.

Why it matters: an insurer asserting a lapse is making a claim that can be tested rather than stating a fact.

None of these rescues a driver who was genuinely operating their own uninsured vehicle. All of them are worth establishing before accepting that outcome.

Talk to James Today

What The Statute Says

Four things to understand about the bar

Stated accurately, because false hope is worse than an unwelcome answer.

It removes the cause of action

A person required but failing to maintain the mandated coverage has no cause of action for economic or noneconomic loss sustained while operating an uninsured automobile.

Fault does not rescue it

It applies even where the other driver was entirely to blame. Courts have described that result as harsh and confirmed it is what the statute requires.

It reaches property damage

Economic loss has been held to include property damage, so the bar is not confined to compensation for injury.

Other provisions bar too

Separate subsections remove a cause of action where a person is convicted of or pleads guilty to driving while intoxicated in connection with an accident, or acted with specific intent to cause injury.

If you were driving your own uninsured car, expect the answer to be no, and let the position be checked properly rather than assumed. For how car accident claims work statewide, see the car accident practice area page.

Two Things People Get Wrong

Where the argument fails and where it does not

Both are worth knowing before spending time on the wrong point.

An out of state policy usually does not save you

People argue that a policy issued elsewhere should be treated as satisfying New Jersey requirements. Courts have rejected that where the vehicle was garaged in New Jersey, holding that the owner should have obtained coverage approved here, and that the bar applies despite the deemer statute. If you live here and keep the car here, an out of state policy without the mandated benefits is unlikely to answer the point.

Being blameless does not save you either

The most common reaction is that this cannot be right when the other driver caused everything. The Supreme Court has considered the provision and upheld it, and courts have said plainly that an uninsured motorist injured by a driver running a red light has no cause of action, describing that as a harsh result mandated by the statute. Whether it extends to particular derivative claims by family members has been litigated, and it is a question to raise specifically rather than to assume in either direction.

Know Before You Call

Three rules about the right to sue

Confirm the current statute, because it has been amended more than once.

N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5(a)

No cause of action for the uninsured operator

A person who at the time of an accident resulting in injuries to them was required but failed to maintain the mandated medical expense benefits coverage has no cause of action for recovery of economic or noneconomic loss sustained as a result of an accident while operating an uninsured automobile.

N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5(b) and (c)

Intoxication and intentional acts

A person convicted of or pleading guilty to driving while intoxicated, or refusal, in connection with an accident has no cause of action for economic or noneconomic loss sustained as a result of it. The same applies to a person acting with specific intent of causing injury to themselves or others.

The Words Operating An Uninsured Automobile

The limit is in the language

The bar addresses loss sustained while operating an uninsured automobile. A passenger in such a vehicle, or a person struck while walking or cycling, is not within that description, which is why establishing exactly what you were doing matters before any conclusion is reached.

Personal Injury Protection, the verbal threshold and the two year filing deadline are covered on the car accident practice area page and the West Orange personal injury page.

What to establish before concluding anything

Four checks, and each has rescued a claim someone had written off.

Confirm whether a policy was actually in force

Lapse and cancellation are frequently asserted and sometimes wrong. Notice requirements and grace periods are real and testable.

Check every household policy

A resident relative's coverage may have extended to your use of the vehicle without your realising it.

Establish what you were doing

Operating, riding as a passenger, walking or cycling. The bar is written around operating an uninsured automobile.

Identify who else was hurt

Passengers in your vehicle are not in the same position you are, and their claims may proceed whatever happens to yours.

conozca a su abogado

James Vasquez

Antes de que James Vasquez representara a su primera persona lesionada, se sentaba al otro lado de la mesa. Como exfiscal y abogado de defensa de aseguradoras, pasó años aprendiendo exactamente cómo se ganan y se pierden estos casos.

Ahora lo usa a su favor. Cuando los ajustadores y los abogados contrarios se enfrentan a James, se enfrentan a alguien que ha leído su manual, ha litigado en sus tribunales y sabe con precisión dónde se quiebran sus argumentos.

Con sede en Clifton y sirviendo a los condados de Passaic, Morris y Essex, su firma le brinda a cada cliente la atención personal de James, respaldada por un equipo que conoce su expediente a fondo.