Condado de Essex / Orange / Lesiones Catastróficas

Orange Catastrophic Injury Lawyer Condado de Essex, New Jersey

If you were hurt in Hackensack, James Vasquez fights to get you every dollar you are owed. He has represented Bergen County's injured since 2004, and he knows this county seat's I-80, Route 4 and Route 17 corridors, its historic Hackensack River bridges, and the streets around Main Street and Hackensack University Medical Center.

Free Case Review

case results

No Fee Unless We Win

Available 24/7

Response Within 1 Hour

Car Accidents in Hackensack

Winning and collecting are different questions

$500 Million

Recovered for New Jersey Families

22 Yrs

Serving New Jersey

Families reasonably assume that establishing responsibility is the hard part. In a catastrophic case with more than one defendant, the harder part is frequently what happens after the percentages are assigned.

New Jersey requires a jury to make two findings. The full value of the injured person's damages, and the percentage of fault attributable to each party, totalling one hundred percent. The judge then moulds the judgment to those findings. If your own share of fault exceeds half, you recover nothing at all. Below that, your award is reduced by your percentage. Then comes the rule that decides collectability. A defendant found sixty percent or more at fault is liable for the whole award, so you can look to that one party for everything. A defendant below sixty percent is responsible only for their own percentage. In a case where one defendant is well insured and another is insolvent, the difference between fifty five and sixty percent can be the difference between a funded lifetime of care and a paper judgment. There is a further wrinkle that surprises people. Fault can be allocated to parties who cannot pay anything, including defendants who are insolvent, immune, or never identified, and juries are directed to allocate based on the evidence rather than on who can pay. James Vasquez has handled New Jersey injury claims since 2004.

See past case results

Injuries we handle

Catastrophic injuries we handle in Orange

The allocation question arises most sharply where several parties contributed.

yes Accident Facts

How allocation plays out in practice

Six situations where the percentages, rather than the liability, decide the outcome.

A contractor that has since folded

Common in construction cases, where a subcontractor whose conduct was central no longer exists or has no meaningful assets.

What it means: fault can still be allocated to them, and juries are directed to allocate on the evidence rather than on who can pay.

The employer in a workplace case

Workers compensation generally bars a claim against the employer, while the employer's conduct may still have contributed to what happened.

What it means: how that interacts with allocation among the remaining defendants is technical, fact specific, and worth addressing at the outset.

Settling with one defendant

Resolving with one party before trial has consequences for what can be recovered from the others, and for how their shares are calculated.

What it means: the sequence and structure of any partial settlement should be planned rather than taken as it comes.

One solvent defendant among several

Where a well insured party and a poorly insured one both contributed, everything turns on whether the solvent defendant crosses the threshold.

What it means: at sixty percent or above, they answer for the whole award. Below it, only their share, and the rest may be uncollectable.

An unidentified driver

Where another vehicle contributed and was never traced. New Jersey permits a jury to apportion fault to a known but unidentified defendant.

What it means: that share comes off the recoverable total unless other coverage responds, which is where uninsured motorist protection becomes central.

Your own share

Any percentage attributed to the injured person reduces the award, and a share exceeding half defeats the claim entirely.

What it means: in a catastrophic case the defence invests heavily here, because a few percentage points are worth a great deal.

None of this is visible from the merits of a case. It is arithmetic applied afterwards, and it decides what a family actually receives.

Talk to James Today

The Arithmetic

Six rules that decide what you collect

These apply to every negligence case in New Jersey and they matter most where the damages are largest.

The jury finds full value first

The award is determined without regard to fault, as the full value of the injured party's damages. Apportionment happens afterwards.

Percentages total one hundred

Each party's share of fault is expressed as a percentage, and all of them together must add to one hundred percent.

Above half and you recover nothing

An injured person whose own share of fault exceeds fifty percent is barred entirely. At or below it, the award is reduced by that percentage.

Sixty percent is the collectability line

A defendant found sixty percent or more at fault can be required to pay the entire award. Below sixty percent, they pay only their own share.

Fault goes to parties who cannot pay

Allocation is based on the evidence rather than on collectability, so shares can land on insolvent, immune or unidentified parties.

Contribution runs between defendants

A defendant who pays more than their share can seek contribution from the others. That is their problem rather than yours, which is the point of the rule.

If more than one party contributed to your injury, the allocation strategy should be part of the case from the beginning rather than an issue that arrives at trial. For how these claims work statewide, see the catastrophic injury practice area page.

Where Recoveries Fall Short

Three ways a large award becomes a small recovery

Each of these is avoidable to some degree, and each is invisible until it happens.

The share that lands on someone who cannot pay

Juries are directed to allocate fault on the evidence, not on whether a party can satisfy a judgment. So a defunct contractor, an unidentified driver or a party protected by immunity can be assigned a substantial percentage, and unless another defendant crosses the sixty percent threshold or separate coverage responds, that portion is simply not collectable. Identifying every solvent party early, and building the evidence that places responsibility with them, is the practical answer.

A defendant who lands just below the threshold

The difference between a defendant at fifty five percent and one at sixty is the difference between recovering their share and recovering everything. In a catastrophic case that gap can be worth millions, which is why the evidence supporting each party's degree of responsibility deserves the same attention as the evidence of liability itself.

Your own percentage

Every point attributed to the injured person comes off the award, and above fifty percent the claim fails entirely. In serious cases the defence invests heavily in this, because the return on a few percentage points is enormous. Seatbelt use, safety equipment and conduct at the scene all get examined, and each is answerable with evidence rather than argument.

Know Before You Call

Three rules of New Jersey's allocation framework

Technical, and directly determinative of what a family receives.

N.J.S.A. 2A:15-5.3

The sixty percent threshold

A party found sixty percent or more responsible for the total damages may be required to pay the full amount, leaving them to seek contribution from the others. A party found less than sixty percent responsible is liable only for the percentage attributable to them. In a multi defendant catastrophic case this single provision frequently decides what is collectable.

N.J.S.A. 2A:15-5.2

What the jury must decide

The trier of fact determines the full value of the injured party's damages without regard to fault, and then the percentage of each party's negligence, with all percentages totalling one hundred. The judge moulds the judgment to those findings.

N.J.S.A. 2A:15-5.1

The bar at more than half

An injured person may not recover where their own negligence is greater than that of the party or parties against whom recovery is sought. Where recovery is permitted, damages are reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to them.

The absence of a cap on compensatory damages, lifetime cost projection, guardianship where capacity is affected and court approval of settlements are covered on the catastrophic injury practice area page and the Orange personal injury page.

What protects the allocation position

Most of it happens early, long before percentages are argued.

Identify every responsible party immediately

Including ones who look peripheral. A party left out cannot be pursued, and their share may still be allocated to them at trial.

Establish who is solvent and insured

Coverage and asset position do not affect the jury's allocation, and they determine entirely what a favourable allocation is worth.

Preserve the evidence that assigns responsibility

Documents, equipment and footage that establish degree rather than merely existence of fault. This is what moves a defendant above or below the threshold.

Address your own conduct honestly

Seatbelt use, safety equipment, what you did at the scene. Every point matters, and preparation beats explanation.

Plan any partial settlement

Resolving with one defendant affects what can be recovered from the others. It should be structured deliberately rather than accepted when offered.

conozca a su abogado

James Vasquez

Antes de que James Vasquez representara a su primera persona lesionada, se sentaba al otro lado de la mesa. Como exfiscal y abogado de defensa de aseguradoras, pasó años aprendiendo exactamente cómo se ganan y se pierden estos casos.

Ahora lo usa a su favor. Cuando los ajustadores y los abogados contrarios se enfrentan a James, se enfrentan a alguien que ha leído su manual, ha litigado en sus tribunales y sabe con precisión dónde se quiebran sus argumentos.

Con sede en Clifton y sirviendo a los condados de Passaic, Morris y Essex, su firma le brinda a cada cliente la atención personal de James, respaldada por un equipo que conoce su expediente a fondo.